<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Get Your Blogs Out &#187; engaged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://getyourblogsout.com/tag/engaged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://getyourblogsout.com</link>
	<description>Just another Bigmouthmedia Blog Network Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Drew Barrymore engaged?</title>
		<link>http://getyourblogsout.com/2010/02/01/drew-barrymore-engaged/</link>
		<comments>http://getyourblogsout.com/2010/02/01/drew-barrymore-engaged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drew barrymore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engaged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getyourblogsout.com/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Mashable (and Facebook), the actress Drew Barrymore is engaged. A recent Mashable post by columnist Stan Schroeder showed a Facebook status update in which the actress showed her relationship status as ‘engaged’. However, other sources online claim the actress is not ready to tie the knot, so who is right? As Stan points [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mashable.com/2010/02/01/drew-barrymore-engagement-facebook/" target="_blank">According to Mashable</a> (and Facebook), the actress Drew Barrymore is engaged.</p>
<div id="attachment_340" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://getyourblogsout.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/drew.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-340" src="http://getyourblogsout.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/drew.jpg" alt="Drew Barrymore's Facebook Status" width="300" height="227" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Drew Barrymore&#039;s Facebook Status</p></div>
<p>A recent Mashable post by columnist <a href="http://mashable.com/author/stan-schroeder/" target="_blank">Stan Schroeder</a> showed a Facebook status update in which the actress showed her relationship status as ‘engaged’.  However, other sources online claim the actress is <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-36117-Socialite-Examiner~y2010m2d1-Drew-Barrymore-and-Justin-Long-are-not-engaged" target="_blank">not ready to tie the knot</a>, so who is right?</p>
<p>As Stan points out in his article, social networks are becoming the first point of contact for an increasing number of celebrities, and it is entirely believable that the evergreen Ms Barrymore has updated her status before informing showbiz sources in the mainstream media.</p>
<p>Or is it another case of hacked Facebook account?</p>
<p>(Image via <a href="http://mashable.com/" target="_blank">Mashable</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://getyourblogsout.com/2010/02/01/drew-barrymore-engaged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

